<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spintronics &#8211; this REALLY could change the technological world FOREVER</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobileshop.com/blog/mobile-phone-news/spintronics-this-really-could-change-the-technological-world-forever/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobileshop.com/blog/mobile-phone-blogs/spintronics-this-really-could-change-the-technological-world-forever/</link>
	<description>Get the latest news, reviews and info in the Mobile World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 12:14:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechnicalMarkus</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileshop.com/blog/mobile-phone-blogs/spintronics-this-really-could-change-the-technological-world-forever/comment-page-1/#comment-17283</link>
		<dc:creator>TechnicalMarkus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileshop.com/blog/?p=3505#comment-17283</guid>
		<description>THAT&#039;s the bit I&#039;m trying to get my head round, because even if it&#039;s a really good insulator, you&#039;re going to lose SOME energy through simple entropy. 

As for piggy-backing data, the actual information would be coded into the direction of spin of an electron (again, IF I&#039;m reading it right). So, instead of just a binary 0 or 1 (from the electron&#039;s charge), you could have different spins meaning different computational thingies. 

Proper, bleeding edge science, and since I only did GCSE Physics, there&#039;s no wonder I&#039;m having trouble grasping bits of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THAT&#8217;s the bit I&#8217;m trying to get my head round, because even if it&#8217;s a really good insulator, you&#8217;re going to lose SOME energy through simple entropy. </p>
<p>As for piggy-backing data, the actual information would be coded into the direction of spin of an electron (again, IF I&#8217;m reading it right). So, instead of just a binary 0 or 1 (from the electron&#8217;s charge), you could have different spins meaning different computational thingies. </p>
<p>Proper, bleeding edge science, and since I only did GCSE Physics, there&#8217;s no wonder I&#8217;m having trouble grasping bits of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveTheGeek</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileshop.com/blog/mobile-phone-blogs/spintronics-this-really-could-change-the-technological-world-forever/comment-page-1/#comment-17245</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveTheGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileshop.com/blog/?p=3505#comment-17245</guid>
		<description>Hold on a sec...ZERO loss in energy when passing electrons over this substance? And you can piggy-back data on the electrons? Doesn&#039;t that mean a battery made of this stuff would essentially hold it&#039;s charge indefinately? And cables made out of this stuff would transfer information with zero resistance, essentially transfering data at the speed of light in a vacuum? Faster than passing an email down a fork of lightning?

Correct me if i&#039;m wrong but that&#039;s the direction my brain theory-crafts in. A fairly startling discovery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hold on a sec&#8230;ZERO loss in energy when passing electrons over this substance? And you can piggy-back data on the electrons? Doesn&#8217;t that mean a battery made of this stuff would essentially hold it&#8217;s charge indefinately? And cables made out of this stuff would transfer information with zero resistance, essentially transfering data at the speed of light in a vacuum? Faster than passing an email down a fork of lightning?</p>
<p>Correct me if i&#8217;m wrong but that&#8217;s the direction my brain theory-crafts in. A fairly startling discovery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechnicalMarkus</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileshop.com/blog/mobile-phone-blogs/spintronics-this-really-could-change-the-technological-world-forever/comment-page-1/#comment-17215</link>
		<dc:creator>TechnicalMarkus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileshop.com/blog/?p=3505#comment-17215</guid>
		<description>Ok, I&#039;ll grant you have a very fair point, and I did get massively overexcited for no reason, and maybe went a bit far suggesting a petahertz chip. But hey, a guy can dream! It goes to show, though, I shouldn&#039;t watch old episodes of Babylon 5 before I write a blog post... lol 

HOWEVER... terahertz devices aren&#039;t outside the realms of possibility, at least according to Science Daily: 

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090617080717.htm 

...and that&#039;s still rather exciting! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I&#8217;ll grant you have a very fair point, and I did get massively overexcited for no reason, and maybe went a bit far suggesting a petahertz chip. But hey, a guy can dream! It goes to show, though, I shouldn&#8217;t watch old episodes of Babylon 5 before I write a blog post&#8230; lol </p>
<p>HOWEVER&#8230; terahertz devices aren&#8217;t outside the realms of possibility, at least according to Science Daily: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090617080717.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090617080717.htm</a> </p>
<p>&#8230;and that&#8217;s still rather exciting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenny</title>
		<link>http://www.mobileshop.com/blog/mobile-phone-blogs/spintronics-this-really-could-change-the-technological-world-forever/comment-page-1/#comment-17173</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobileshop.com/blog/?p=3505#comment-17173</guid>
		<description>Steady on there, chap.  It&#039;s just a low-power semicondustor technology. It will no more change the world than MOSFETs did when they appeared back in the 80s. It&#039;s just an incremental reduction in electrical efficiency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steady on there, chap.  It&#8217;s just a low-power semicondustor technology. It will no more change the world than MOSFETs did when they appeared back in the 80s. It&#8217;s just an incremental reduction in electrical efficiency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

